Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:59
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Do you share your food easily? With whom, and why?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Here's a fresh look at Clockwork Revolution, coming "in due time" - Eurogamer
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do Democrats claim to be Americans when they are actually Globalists?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Google’s Gemini AI will summarize PDFs for you when you open them - The Verge
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.